Japanese Reviews Reviews

Film Review: Just Only Love (2018) by Rikiya Imaizumi

It is always a pleasure to watch films that portray unremarkable (normal, one could say) love stories with realism and still manage to be entertaining. does just that with ““, a film based on the novel “Ai Ga Nanda”, by Mitsuyo Kakuta.

Just Only Love screened at Camera Japan

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is Screen-Shot-2019-09-01-at-3.44.11-PM-850x322.png

Teruko is an office worker who is involved in a relationship that could only be described as one-sided. You see, she has been in love with Mamoru ever since they met at a friend’s wedding, to the point that the phone calls she receives from him to meet are the only thing that matters in her life, including her friends and work. Eventually, the two of them spend a night together, and Teruko starts to believe that they will become a couple, finally. However, Mamoru does not share her feelings, as it is obvious that he spends time with her just because an alternative is not present. However, he is not impolite or exploitative towards her, he just does not share her feelings. Eventually, he meets another girl, Sumire, who is very fond of, with her, however, having the role he had in his relationship with Teruko. On a secondary axis, Yoko, Teruko’s best friend, has a similar relationship with Nakamura, with her being the “dominant” one, although in a more exploitative fashion.

Imaizumi uses the story to make a number of quite realistic comments about the modern “rules” of relationships. The most obvious one regards the fact that a lot of them are almost completely one-sided, with Imaizumi exploring this concept from both sides. One side refers to the “submissive” one states that he/she either believes that he/she can turn the “dominant” one around or that is blinded by his/her love, to the point that the unresponsiveness from the other side is not visible at all. The one regarding the “dominant” one, however, is not an accusation, since Imaizumi makes a point of saying how difficult it is sometimes not to take the “easy road”, which, in this case, refers to accepting the companionship of someone who really seems to cherish you, and even more, seems happy even though you do not do much to return his/her feelings. The fact that Imaizumi explores this aspect from both sides, with sincerity, and not pointing fingers, is one of the narrative’s greatest aspects.

The second one refers to the bad side of love, as represented by Teruko, a love that is, in essence, an obsession, making the one who feels it forget about everything else, in essence destroying his/her own life, on multiple levels, both professionally and socially.

The third one, which eventually becomes another central comment, derives from two parallel questions: Firstly, why do the “subservient” ones do not leave, since they are not getting almost anything back of what they offer on an emotional and practical level? Secondly, why do the “dominant” ones do not make them leave, since most of the time, they are more bothered than content? The answer, one could say for both categories, is the same: Loneliness and convenience. Imaizumi makes a point of highlighting the first through actual dialogues, but the second is presented contextually, and actually involves both parties, thus resulting in another comment: finding someone you want to have a relationship with is quite hard due to the rhythms and the circumstances of everyday life, so everyone has to compromise, either they realize it or not.

The presentation of all the aforementioned concept is exceptional, in one of the few occasions where one film justifies its (over 120 minutes) duration completely. The editing, which induces the film with a mid-tempo quite fitting to its aesthetics, and the realistic cinematography definitely help in that regard, with the same applying to a number of narrative tricks, like the surrealism deriving from Teruko speaking with her younger self, occasionally even in scenes of her past.

Furthermore, the film benefits the most from the acting, with giving a great performance as Teruko, highlighting a number of sentiments and psychological statuses, both silently and vocally, with the same artistry. The various scenes where she cannot hide her disappointment, and the ones where she fights with Nakamura and Yoko, respectively, are the highlights of her impressive effort. Ryo Narita is convincing as Mamoru, with the same applying to as Yoko, although I felt that with his quite measured performance as Nakamura, and as the eccentric but quite logical Sumire, are the ones that steal the show regarding the secondary parts.

“Just Only Love” is sincere, intelligent, realistic, thorough and quite entertaining, in an impressive package that strays far away from the silliness of the romcoms. Definitely one of the best indie films of the year.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXc_JlCqQE4

About the author

Panos Kotzathanasis

Panagiotis (Panos) Kotzathanasis is a film critic and reviewer, specialized in Asian Cinema. He is the owner and administrator of Asian Movie Pulse, one of the biggest portals dealing with Asian cinema. He is a frequent writer in Hancinema, Taste of Cinema, and his texts can be found in a number of other publications including SIRP in Estonia, Film.sk in Slovakia, Asian Dialogue in the UK, Cinefil in Japan and Filmbuff in India.

Since 2019, he cooperates with Thessaloniki Cinematheque in Greece, curating various tributes to Asian cinema. He has participated, with video recordings and text, on a number of Asian movie releases, for Spectrum, Dekanalog and Error 4444. He has taken part as an expert on the Erasmus+ program, “Asian Cinema Education”, on the Asian Cinema Education International Journalism and Film Criticism Course.

Apart from a member of FIPRESCI and the Greek Cinema Critics Association, he is also a member of NETPAC, the Hellenic Film Academy and the Online Film Critics Association.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

>