Japanese Reviews Reviews

Documentary Review: Ainu Puri (2024) by Takeshi Fukunaga

Ainu Puri still fishing
Screenshot
"I don't feel anything particular for being indigenous"

When he is not directing episodes for series like “” and “”, usually deals with the Ainu. After “” back in 2020, he has come up with a documentary this time, which takes an approach that frequently looks like that of a feature film. The title of the movie represents the cultural and spiritual practices, the daily activities, and the moral principles that guide the Ainu lifestyle, emphasizing respect for nature, spiritual beliefs, and communal living. This concept is central to the identity and heritage of the Ainu people.

is screening at Busan International Film Festival

The film begins with Shigeki, an indigenous Ainu from Shiranuka, Hokkaido, going Marek fishing with his 10-year-old son Motoki. As we hear him talk about the fact that the Ainu believe gods exist in every thing, we see him exhibiting and teaching to his son, the rituals involved in both before and after the fishing, with the hitting on the head to the fish while apologizing in a way, being quite indicative. Fukunaga follows the family, including Fujiko, the mother, in their everyday life, where they comment on the issues they have, the tragedy they have experienced, and the fact that they are happy and moving on as time passes. As such, bullying in school has been exchanged with a fascination about the Ainu nowadays, to a point at least, although the structural issues having to do with their identity and culture, as much as fishing and hunting rights still persist.

As a second point of focus, Ryutaru and Satoru, two more Ainu, also take up a large part of the documentary. Particularly the first, with his involvement in the traditional dancing and performance of the Ainu, and his effort to commercialize it in order to both find money for a group of people who are still poor and to promote and preserve their culture, looks almost heroic. The training of kids both in language and the aforementioned, the rehearsals and the actual performances take a large part of the documentary, in a part that could have been a bit more restricted, but given the purpose of the movie, which seems to mirror that of Ryutaru, is justified.

The combination of all the aforementioned works quite well throughout the movie, with Keiko Deguchi and Takuya Kawakami’s editing emerging as one of the movie’s best traits, particularly in the way the various segments interchange. Furthermore, the way they are all combined in order to present a compact story is truly impressive, with one of the last scenes essentially functioning as a kind of happy ending.

It also helps a lot that many night scenes are exquisitely shot, with the quality of Erik Shirai’s cinematography being one of the main reasons, along with the aforementioned approach to the story, that allow the movie to unfold like a feature. Furthermore, at 81 minutes, “Ainu Puri” does not overextend its welcome in particular, while the way the narrative comes full circle in the end is also impressive.

“Ainu Puri” is an excellent documentary that realistically portrays the lives of Ainu nowadays, without exoticizing or dramatizing it, in an approach that is definitely refreshing.

About the author

Panos Kotzathanasis

Panagiotis (Panos) Kotzathanasis is a film critic and reviewer, specialized in Asian Cinema. He is the owner and administrator of Asian Movie Pulse, one of the biggest portals dealing with Asian cinema. He is a frequent writer in Hancinema, Taste of Cinema, and his texts can be found in a number of other publications including SIRP in Estonia, Film.sk in Slovakia, Asian Dialogue in the UK, Cinefil in Japan and Filmbuff in India.

Since 2019, he cooperates with Thessaloniki Cinematheque in Greece, curating various tributes to Asian cinema. He has participated, with video recordings and text, on a number of Asian movie releases, for Spectrum, Dekanalog and Error 4444. He has taken part as an expert on the Erasmus+ program, “Asian Cinema Education”, on the Asian Cinema Education International Journalism and Film Criticism Course.

Apart from a member of FIPRESCI and the Greek Cinema Critics Association, he is also a member of NETPAC, the Hellenic Film Academy and the Online Film Critics Association.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

>