Japanese Reviews Reviews

Film Analysis: Seven Samurai (1954) by Akira Kurosawa

Seven Samurai (1954) by Akira Kurosawa
"This is the nature of war: By protecting others, you save yourselves. If you only think of yourself, you'll only destroy yourself"

The 1950s are considered the Golden Age of Japanese cinema. The aftermath of World War II and particularly the atomic bomb, and the subsequent American occupation left the country scarred, but filled with inspiration and eagerness to start over. One of the most iconic films of this era is 's “”, considered among the most influential movies of all time, and the basis for a plethora of productions, with John Sturges' “The Magnificent Seven” being a direct adaptation. 

 This influence became widely known, even at the time, as the film was nominated for two Oscars (Best Art Direction-Set Decoration, Black-and-White; and Best Costume Design, Black-and-White), while Kurosawa won the Silver Lion at the Venice Film Festival.

In 16th century Japan, during the feudal wars, an entire village is on the border of starvation due to the constant raids by a gang of armed robbers. When a villager learns, by chance, that the gang is planning to steal their whole crop during the harvest, the desperate inhabitants decide to ask for protection. Their “choice” is Kambei, a ronin who has fallen on hard times. Despite the fact that they only offer three meals a day, he accepts and even finds six more samurai to help, with the last one, named Kikuchiyo, being the most colorful. The samurai try to train the villagers and to organize the village's defense, although the obstacles seem to be constant. The film reaches its apogee in the final sequence, with the gang's raid.

Through this script, which Kurosawa penned along with Shinobu Hashimoto and Hideo Oguni, the Japanese master presented his ideas on a number of social issues. These include the concept of the samurai and of the peasants, which are presented in a completely new light, which shattered the image they held for the public, particularly the latter. 

 Furthermore, his notions about chivalry and self-sacrifice are also presented, along with the realistic depiction of the circumstances of the era. The script allowed Kurosawa to combine action and substance in an elaborate fashion that allowed the film to be both entertaining and meaningful.

Kurosawa took the essence of “” and elevated it to a higher level with “Seven Samurai”. Here, only the acts that derive from emotion are considered valid, and as such, original. Kurosawa managed to present this truth through violent physical action, in a fashion that keeps the film meaningful and entertaining at the same time.

His main message is eloquently depicted in the final scene, where the remaining samurai are standing to the mound where their comrades are buried. As the farmers ignore them in order to proceed with their work in the fields, Kanbei says to the other two that they have lost again, and in their silent question, he elaborates that they lost, since the farmers are the real winners. The message is obvious – although people can try to cooperate, absolute equality is impossible. There will always be winners and losers, even among the winning side. All the magnificent scenes and sequences of the film actually lead toward this truth, but the audience cannot realize that until the end, captivated by the masterful direction. Furthermore, despite its long duration, the film's pace is quite fast, as Kurosawa highlights, with his direction, the story and the characters.

For centuries, the members of the caste of samurai were considered noble heroes and warriors, individuals that had nothing to do with those in the lower castes, icons of chivalry and virtue. This image started “crumbling” after the end of World War II, but Kurosawa gave it a major hit with the way he depicted them in the film. Kikuchiyo eloquently expresses Kurosawa's perception for samurai in the scene where he brings the armor of a dead samurai to his comrades. He accuses them for the despair their way of living has brought upon the farmers, who were the most numerous, but also the most tormented group in the feudal Japan of the 16th century.

Check this video

According to him, their constant battles have ruined the land, stripping the farmers of fields to plant their crop. The taxation the shoguns force upon the villagers to finance the wars of the samurai barely allows them a meager income to live. Furthermore, they frequently forced the villagers to leave their fields in order to do the jobs deemed unworthy by the samurai. Lastly, the constant raids by the occasional conflicting forces strip the rest of the population of the little they have left.

In a different kind of criticism, Kurosawa portrays the samurai as naive, since they easily fall for the tricks of the cunning but illiterate samurai. The fact that Kikuchiyo, who is not a samurai, eventually becomes one of them, as they do not realize he is the son of the farmer, also moves toward this direction. However, in the end, he elevates them as they are portrayed as heroic and highly competent warriors who are not afraid to sacrifice themselves.

On the other hand, Kurosawa does not exemplify the villagers either, despite their circumstances. He portrays them as cunning, cheating individuals who are always ready to go to extremes in order to survive. These traits become even worse, since they take advantage of the samurai who agree to give their lives for them, just for three meals a day. However, as in the case of the samurai, he manages to elevate them through Kikujiro, a man who eventually proved at least as chivalrous and competent as the actual samurai.

The film features a number of scenes, all of which are impressive and meaningful; notably, the one with the “fake” duel in the beginning, which eventually results in the death of one of the two fighters. However, the one that truly stands apart is the final one, between the combined forces of the samurai and the villagers, and the bandits, which takes place in heavy rain.

Kurosawa used a plethora of cameras to shoot the scene, and this tactic allowed him to edit the film in the best way possible. The sequence takes place in various places in the village, depicting what is occurring with each of the characters at the same time, with Kurosawa guiding the spectator with the camera moves. The pacing is short and curt in its presentation, and along with the jump cuts and the cutting on action, it demands the audience's full attention while retaining the agony until the end. When each of the sequences end, Kurosawa uses wide shots to stress the fact, and also to release the tension. This becomes particularly visible at the end of the film. Furthermore, the quick cutting and the use of telephoto lenses stresses the chaotic and claustrophobic feeling the scene emits. Due to the above, the scene has been hailed as one of cinema's greatest action sequences.

The article continues on the next page

About the author

Panos Kotzathanasis

My name is Panos Kotzathanasis and I am Greek. Being a fan of Asian cinema and especially of Chinese kung fu and Japanese samurai movies since I was a little kid, I cultivated that love during my adolescence, to extend to the whole of SE Asia.

Starting from my own blog in Greek, I then moved on to write for some of the major publications in Greece, and in a number of websites dealing with (Asian) cinema, such as Taste of Cinema, Hancinema, EasternKicks, Chinese Policy Institute, and of course, Asian Movie Pulse. in which I still continue to contribute.

In the beginning of 2017, I launched my own website, Asian Film Vault, which I merged in 2018 with Asian Movie Pulse, creating the most complete website about the Asian movie industry, as it deals with almost every country from East and South Asia, and definitely all genres.

You can follow me on Facebook and Twitter.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

>